Search for: "Heck v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 693
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2016, 4:31 pm by Michael B. Stack
Last week I sent out a survey and asked the question, How The Heck Did YOU End Up in Workers’ Comp? [read post]
4 May 2023, 8:54 pm by Justin Levitt
The Court has asked for another round of briefing on what the heck should happen in Moore v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 11:44 am
So I gotta admit, I was so befuddled by the caption, I skimmed the opinion at first to just figure out how the heck the case was in the Ninth Circuit if it involves North Dakota. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 6:09 pm
The Court held that a section 1983 claim based on an illegal arrest accrues at the time of the arrest, not when the convictions were reversed by a state court, and Heck v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 6:09 pm
The Court held that a section 1983 claim based on an illegal arrest accrues at the time of the arrest, not when the convictions were reversed by a state court, and Heck v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 4:17 am by Brad Kuhn
United States (see our summary here); we're waiting for a decision after oral argument in Koontz v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 9:01 am
  California was the first state to define and adopt the community property system. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:39 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
As a free man no longer in custody, he then brought a Section 1983 case challenging the improprieties that led to the attempted murder conviction.The Supreme Court decided in Heck v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:51 pm by snahmod
There I briefly discussed the complicated issues of (1) choosing the right state statute of limitations, (2) accrual of section 1983 claims and (3) when section 1983 claims are […] [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 6:18 pm
In footnote seven of its Heck decision, the Supreme Court stated:a suit for damages attributable to an allegedly unreasonable search may lie even if the challenged search produced evidence that was introduced in a state criminal trial resulting in the § 1983 plaintiff's still-outstanding conviction. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 3:31 pm
Finding such a principle to be impracticable, the Court stated that it was "not disposed to embrace this bizarre extension of Heck. [read post]