Search for: "Hefty v. Certified Settlement Class"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2011, 8:33 am
The Facebook Beacon ("Beacon Class Action Settlement Approved -- Lane v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 8:18 pm
Though the settlement included a hefty price tag, the Facebook litigation was an unusual case filed under the BIPA in both class size and subject matter and should not necessarily serve a guidepost for BIPA settlements in the future. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
Not only did the rate of filings increase in federal court, but the number of class action cases resolved through voluntary dismissals before a class was certified skyrocketed. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
These defense-friendly case decisions have shielded D&O insurers from potentially hefty jury verdicts and damages – to date. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
These defense-friendly case decisions have shielded D&O insurers from potentially hefty jury verdicts and damages – to date. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
SETTLEMENTS Walmart to Pay $27 million for Improper Chemical Disposal. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm
In Salzberg v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm
A plaintiff whose PII, PFI, or PPI was stolen by hackers typically brings suit against the hacked company on his or her own behalf and on behalf of a class of similarly situated people, hoping the presiding court will certify the proposed class and allow the case to proceed as a class action.[3] Causes of action in customer cases run a wide gamut of legal theories, from traditional tort claims (negligence and fraud) to allegations of state and federal… [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm
Anderson, pertains to the Capital One Financial Corporation (“Capital One”) class action multi-district litigation (MDL), which consolidated over 60 cybersecurity-related class actions relating to a data security incident announced by Capital One on July 29th, 2019. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
A New York federal judge agreed to certify an interlocutory appeal by SiriusXM against the ruling that gave state copyright law protection to pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
