Search for: "Held v. Commissioner Social Security Administration"
Results 61 - 80
of 235
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2021, 9:13 am
On Feb. 11, after Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas was confirmed, DHS announced that it would begin Phase 1 of a program to restore processing for those individuals already enrolled. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm
The Court held that there was an inherent power to prevent misuse of its procedure where the process would be manifestly unfair to a litigant or would otherwise bring the administration of justice into disrepute. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 6:19 pm
With a new administration and a new Congress come key leadership changes and new priorities at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
They were popular domestic terrorists even though responsible for, more than 200 bombings and dozens of robberies between 1963 and 1970 that left six people dead, and the kidnapping of the British trade commissioner, and the kidnapping and murder of a Quebec government cabinet minister. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 7:21 am
In Collins v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm
By way of comparison, in 2019 there were 62 federal court securities suits against non-U.S. companies, representing about 15% of all federal court securities suit filings in 2019. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court held that the federal government can execute people on death row using a single lethal injection. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm
The Judge held that covert surveillance could constitute harassment even if the defendants did not intend the surveillance to be discovered. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 8:38 am
The secretary of Health and Human Services has long delegated authority to make the second determination to the FDA commissioner. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 3:51 am
irketi v. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm
Serge Joyal cited the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Canada (Information Commissioner) v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm
” The New York Times v CIA No.18-2112-cv, concerning whether national security cases which the president had tweeted about, brings the information at issue for FOIA requests. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
FDA Commissioner Stephen M. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am
Koppelman accuses me of being too forgiving of the civil rights commissioner in Masterpiece and of the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:25 am
The High Court concludes with a reminder of the Court of Appeal guidance on human rights claims arising out of alleged maladministration in Anufrijeva v Southwark LBC (200)] EWCA Civ 1406 a claimant should expect to have to explain at the permission stage why it would not be more appropriate to pursue internal complaint procedures, or proceed via the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration or Local Government Ombudsman – systems designed to deal economically… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
