Search for: "Held v. Secretary of Health and Human Services" Results 1 - 20 of 435
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2017, 1:58 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
A fair balance had been struck when considering the overall scheme for separate provisions of free health services. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:40 am by KIRSTEN SJØVOLL, MATRIX
The question was whether he failed to discharge his duty under the National Health Service Act 2006, s 3 to “take such steps as he considers necessary to meet all reasonable requirements” for services. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 4:29 am by Howard Friedman
Burwell, (10th Cir., June 30, 2014), the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals held that it would enjoin enforcement of the accommodation against several Wyoming Catholic charitable and educational institutions so long as they inform the Secretary of Health and Human Services in writing (but not necessarily using the government's form) that they are non-profit organizations that hold themselves out as religious and have religious objections to providing… [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 8:20 am by The Federalist Society
 The issue was whethera 180-day statutory time limit for filing an appeal with the Provider Reimbursement Review Board from a final Medicare payment determination is subject to equitable tolling, meaning that a court has power to delay the running of the time limit in the interests of fairness.In an opinion delivered by Justice Ginsburg, the Court held unanimously that the 180-day period is not jurisdictional and that the Secretary of the Department of Health and… [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 8:20 am by The Federalist Society
 The issue was whethera 180-day statutory time limit for filing an appeal with the Provider Reimbursement Review Board from a final Medicare payment determination is subject to equitable tolling, meaning that a court has power to delay the running of the time limit in the interests of fairness.In an opinion delivered by Justice Ginsburg, the Court held unanimously that the 180-day period is not jurisdictional and that the Secretary of the Department of Health and… [read post]
11 May 2021, 11:44 am by David Bender
On May 10, 2021, the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) announced that— consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:11 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
BURWELL, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL., (2015) No. 14-114. [read post]
1 May 2015, 7:23 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The Court will, however, order a preliminary injunction to require Defendants Sylvia Matthews Burwell, Yvette Roubideaux, John Hubbard, Jr., and Frank Dayish (collectively, “the Defendants”), to fund the Navajo Health Foundation—Sage Memorial Hospital, Inc., according to the terms of: (i) the Annual Funding Agreement Between Navajo Health Foundation /Sage Memorial Hospital and the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human… [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 3:49 am
Secretary of Health and Human Services, 774 F.2d 685 (6th Cir. 1985). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
British Pregnancy Advisory Service v Secretary of State for Health [2011] EWHC 235 (Admin) - read judgment The High Court has ruled that the law requiring that administration of the early medical abortion drugs take place at hospital cannot be read down to allow self-administration at home. [read post]
US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra announced on Monday that healthcare providers are prohibited from discriminating against gay and transgender individuals, reversing a controversial Donald Trump-era policy. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 4:00 pm by Emily Coombs Waddell
Missouri, the Court found that the mandate should be upheld as the actions of the Department of Health and Human Services were within the limits imposed by Congress, also noting that the Department had a history of issuing rules similar to the one at issue. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:30 am by Rachel Lafferty and Shannon Murray
The post West London Mental Health NHS Trust v Chhabra [2013] UKSC 80 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
In a 6-2 opinion authored by Justice Kennedy, the Supreme Court held in Gobeille that ERISA Section 514 preempts Vermont’s requirement that health insurers and other health benefit payers report health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for inclusion in an all-inclusive health care data base. [read post]