Search for: "Helm v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2021, 11:39 am
In addition to the state and federal courts of D.C., VA, and M.D., he is a member of the Federal Courts in Puerto Rico, Colorado, and Texas, as well as the Court of Federal Claims, the Federal Circuit, where he has recently argued and won three appellate matters, the Veteran’s Court of Appeals, and the United States Supreme Court, where he was lead counsel on a False Claims Act case (See United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 10:30 am
Title III was enacted to “deter trafficking in wrongfully confiscated property” and provide “United States nationals who were the victims of these confiscations . . . with a judicial remedy in the courts of the United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 5:30 am
Helms v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am
Hungary International Extradition Treaty with the United States December 1, 1994, Date-Signed March 18, 1997, Date-In-Force MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 104TH CONGRESS SENATE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL THE WHITE HOUSE, May 8, 1995. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 9:38 am
Seaboard Marine, Ltd., Slip Copy, 2021 WL 4902506 (United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Under Title III of that act, United States citizens who had their property confiscated by the Castro regime were given the right to file suit against those who traffic in such properties (See Libertad Act §§ 301-306). [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 6:11 am
The court in Gonzalez was interpreting a provision in Title III stating that “[i]n the case of property confiscated before March 12, 1996, a United States national may not bring an action under [the Act] ... unless such national acquires ownership of the claim before March 12, 1996. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 4:10 am
In Sikhs For Justice v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 3:56 pm
This type of per se exception to the warrant requirement was rejected by the United States Supreme Court in Missouri v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:34 am
United States (2005) - felon firearm possession ban doesn't cover foreign convictionsTennessee v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
Politico is reporting: That 15 personnel were “disciplined” as a result of United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 6:27 am
United States and Gould v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:43 am
United States (2005) - felon firearm possession ban doesn't cover foreign convictions Tennessee v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 10:41 am
Facts: This case (Helms v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Helm v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:02 am
Gore, Citizens United, the State of the Union address, or a confirmation hearing. [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:25 am
” United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 12:11 pm
The case, King v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 5:15 pm
United States in the context of the past eight years of Obamacare litigation. [read post]
