Search for: "Henderson et al. v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 1:18 pm
” United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
Music and Copyright IPKat provides a summary of the three cases brought in the United States claiming that the song Thinking Out Loud performed by Ed Sheeran, copied Let’s Get It On performed by Marvin Gaye. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 3:17 pm
Oklahoma; Self Defense) United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Cockrum v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae, New York v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 6:29 am
New Interpretation 303-5 states that “professional identity focuses on what it means to be a lawyer and the special obligations lawyers have to their clients and society. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:00 pm
” United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:48 am
Zarda et al., as Co-Independent Executors of the Estate of Zarda (from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit), and No. 18– 107, R. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 11:10 am
Danae Azaria, Wightman et al. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 4:01 am
”[17] Referring to one of Papin’s previous periods of incarceration, Justice Henderson indicates that she expressed to the psychologist of the secure unit that “the correctional system was unjust,”[18] and that psychologist testified that Papin “did not trust the custodial system. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 8:18 am
Facts: This case (Obeslo et al v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 7:29 am
Rockefeller et al., No. 655538/2016, 2018 BL 138448 (Sup. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
The Article ends with a preliminary consideration of the consequences of this movement for domestic CSR in the United States. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
In the United States, shareholder primacy continues to define the legal standard.[15] “While many deplored the disconnect between corporate power and social need, and CSR . . . became a more frequent discussion topic in corporate and academic circles, not many corporations acted meaningfully in pursuing CSR. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Is it an autonomous community, like a nation-state? [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 8:10 pm
Johnson & Johnson et al. was won by Ms. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 9:07 am
The court deferred on whether Simon et al. could amend their complaint to allege such a connection with greater specificity. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
