Search for: "Henderson v. Langley" Results 1 - 1 of 1
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2015, 12:24 pm by Giles Peaker
He had pursued a crusade against Mr Gopee which was entirely unjustified. ii) As a result Mr Gopee and his associated companies have been and will be continued to be deprived of their right to a fair trial contrary to the Human Rights Act 1998 if all the actions are dealt with by HHJ Mackie. iii) HHJ Mackie had disregarded the changes in legislation to the Consumer Credit Act 1974. iv) HHJ Mackie had wrongly reopened past cases without regard to authorities such as Henderson v… [read post]