Search for: "Henning v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 1,569
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2009, 7:34 am by Andrew Frisch
“[W]hen the action is in essence one for the recovery of money from the state, the state is the real, substantial party in interest and is entitled to invoke its sovereign immunity from suit even though individual officials are nominal defendants. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm by Luke Rioux
Wrong Burt LancasterThe United States Supreme Court recently decided Metrish v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Matt Kaiser, Above the Law; Peter Henning, N.Y. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 10:08 am by Eugene Volokh
I'm not sure this would be exactly right in a case where the court actually enforces an arbitral order; I think there would be state action restricting speech, but likely constitutionally permissible state action because the parties had contractually waived their speech rights, see Cohen v. [read post]