Search for: "Henry v. Cox" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2010, 9:17 am by Mary L. Dudziak
  Two books on Henry Clay, AT THE EDGE OF THE PRECIPICE: Henry Clay and the Compromise that Saved the Union by Robert V. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 1:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64, 64-67 (1964) (statements made by a district attorney at a press conference); Henry v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 6:07 pm
Numbers 3, 4 and 5 are all California: California 14th, Anna Eshoos' Silicon Valley seat; California 48th, the Irvine Ranch, once host to Chris Cox of SEC fame, and California 30th, entertainment central, Henry Waxman's LA West Side.But flip over to the other end--who is at the bottom of the list? [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 12:44 pm by Scott Bomboy
And in 1926, Supreme Court Chief Justice William Howard Taft said in Myers v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:28 am by Rosalind English
There can be no debate, as Henry Oliver has pointed out, about the lawfulness of the Home Secretary’s decision. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 2:55 pm
But, after intervention by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson -- and, ultimately, by President Bush, according to White House aides -- Clement did not file. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Federal Split There is at least one example that illustrates an inter-jurisdictional incongruity of the latter variety.In Henry v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The Reyelts Opinion In addition to Texas Insurance Code chapter 4102, the legal landscape forming the basis of the Keys' motion for class certification includes a federal court case, Reyelts v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The Reyelts Opinion In addition to Texas Insurance Code chapter 4102, the legal landscape forming the basis of the Keys' motion for class certification includes a federal court case, Reyelts v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Cox, 477 So. 2d 963 (Ala. 1985), that failure by the plaintiff (as opposed to a prescribing physician) to read a drug label precluded any finding of causation:[N]othing in the nature of [defendant’s] inadequate warning prevented plaintiff from reading it. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 9:20 am
Thanks, Hugo Cox, for drawing the IPKat's attention to this action before the little-known EFTA Court in Case E-1/09 EFTA Surveillance Authority v Principality of Liechtenstein, brought on 3 February 2009. [read post]