Search for: "Hepburn v. Hepburn"
Results 1 - 20
of 96
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2022, 12:10 pm
More than any other decision, Queen v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:27 am
In the Audrey Hepburn dispute, should there be any infringement of a right to the portrayal of Holly? [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:55 pm
(Hepburn v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 12:48 pm
They had a soon together, Luca Andrea, who was born in 1970.The IPKat has already reported on a case brought jointly by Luca Andrea Dotti and Audrey Hepburn's other son, Sean Hepburn Ferrer, and decided by the Court of First Instance of Milan in 2015 concerning unauthorized evocation (not even direct use) of the likeness of Audrey Hepburn in an advertisement. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
2/7/1870: Hepburn v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
2/7/1870: Hepburn v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
2/7/1870: Hepburn v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
2/7/1870: Hepburn v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
2/7/1870: Hepburn v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 12:00 pm
Dewitt (1869) Hepburn v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:52 am
Hepburn v Hepburn 2010 NY Slip Op 08703 Decided on November 23, 2010 Appellate Division, Second Department The Second Department affirmed the lower court’s decision to deny husband’s motion to stay entry of a QDRO. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 8:50 am
Today's advance release family law opinion: Hepburn v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 9:30 pm
Hepburn, which is forthcoming in the Supreme Court Review:The American hearsay rule took its modern form in Queen v. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 6:15 am
It is styled, Mazhar Footsteps, LLC v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 8:07 pm
In United States ex rel Hepburn v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 12:09 pm
Attinger, Adam v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 7:43 pm
" [Hepburn v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 5:22 pm
You might think that "Robert Glen Golightly" is a fake name -- homage to Truman Capote's Holly Golightly, or Audrey Hepburn in the film version of the book.But, no, it's a real name. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
Deane v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 11:38 am
And the prevailing view of the time was reflected in Justice Holmes' now-infamous decision in Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
