Search for: "Herrick v. Herrick" Results 61 - 80 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2023, 5:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(Freeman v Brecher, 155AD3d 453,454 [1st Dept 2017], citing Kaminsky v Herrick, Feinstein LLP, 59 AD3d 1, 13 [1st Dept 2008]; see also Kaufman v Maritt Hock Hamroff, LLP, 192 AD3d 1092, 1093 [2d Dept 2021] [“Relief pursuant to Judiciary Law S 487 ‘is not given lightly’ and requires a showing of ‘egregious conduct or chronic and extreme pattern of behavior on the part of defendant attorneys’.]) [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 4:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
There is no support for plaintiffs’ contention that defendant had a duty to renew the lease on their behalf, or to advise them of the need to do so (see Kaminsky v Herrick, Feinstein LLP, 59 AD3d 1, 9 [1st Dept 2008], lv denied 12 NY3d 715 [2009]). [read post]
12 May 2021, 9:15 am by Eric Goldman
Furthermore, because Section 230 would apply to claims about outputted content, this opinion wouldn’t change cases like Herrick v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
The Appellate Division agreed, holding that:Supreme Court correctly determined that the plaintiffs' claims against the Teachers' Association were time-barred, citing Bitterman v Herricks Teachers' Association, 220 AD2d 473. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 4:48 pm by Eric Goldman
On Wednesday, I’ll be on a panel regarding Herrick v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 1:16 am
Schmidt Subscription Required ALBANY COUNTYReal Property State Directed to Disburse Funds Due to Petitioner For Condemnation Award Under Agreement Matter of Herricks Fore Plan Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:40 am by Hadley Baker, Vishnu Kannan
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Carrie Goldberg explained why Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act needs to be changed to hold communication platforms accountable for the safety of its users in light of ongoing litigation in the Herrick v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 4:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 126 A.D.3d 506, 507 (1st Dept 2015); see also Kaminsky v Herrick, Feinstein LLP, 59 AD3d 1, 13 (1st Dept 2008); Solow Mgt. [read post]