Search for: "Herring v. Douglas*" Results 1 - 20 of 95
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm by Richard Hunt
This sort of thing intrigues me, so I checked another case filed the same day, Brast v Columbian Cuisine, Case No. 4:23-cv-1339 (SD Tex). [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  This process of judicial nullification culminated in Plessy v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 6:15 am by Stephen Mayeaux
His betrothed is also identified by her race when he refers to her as a mestiza. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  She bases her skepticism in part on her justifiably prize-winning work on the history of racial relations in America. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In her famous “Remember the ladies” letterto her husband, for instance, Abigail Adams presented a feminist interpretation of the Declaration of Independence even before the Declaration was written and signed. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Wrestling with Religious Diversity, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Constitutional Faith and Veneration, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
— Erwin Chemerinsky (June 25, 2021) More than a century before Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg became legendary for her biting dissents, Justice John Marshall Harlan I was the original notorious dissenter. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 2:00 am by Mark Schickman, Schickman Law
” Therefore, while courts have adopted the McDonnell Douglas test for FEHA employment discrimination cases that don’t involve mixed motives, the supreme court found it shouldn’t govern mixed-motives cases, where the employee bears only an initial burden of showing discrimination “was a substantial factor motivating his or her termination. [read post]