Search for: "Herring v. Douglas*" Results 81 - 95 of 95
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2007, 7:43 am
The case I was given was of a genre that had existed for literally hundreds of years: a father or mother had given the farmhouse to one of the children on condition that the parent be permitted to live there for the rest of his/her life, but this arrangement had subsequently broken down. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court gets ready to hear New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 7:21 am
Phone: (404) 881-0292 Fax: (404) 881-6997 E-mail: gaaarp@aarp.org Web: http://www.aarp.orgga ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Southeast Disability and Business Technical Assistance Center Center for Assistive Technology and Environmental Access Georgia Tech, 490 10th Street Atlanta, GA 30318 Phone: (404) 385-0636; (800) 949-4232 (V/TTY/Toll Free) E-mail: sedbtac@catea.org Web: http://www.sedbtac.org Georgia ADA Exchange 4164 Admiral Drive Chamblee, GA 30341… [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” [This became painfully evident in the 1896 Supreme Court case Plessy v. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm by Richard Hunt
This sort of thing intrigues me, so I checked another case filed the same day, Brast v Columbian Cuisine, Case No. 4:23-cv-1339 (SD Tex). [read post]
2 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Consider that the lawyer Trump hired to defend him against a charge that he incited violence against peaceful protesters at a campaign event cited Clinton v. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
We talked about some of the many battles this interaction has birthed, from massive resistance against Brown v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 2:00 am by Mark Schickman, Schickman Law
” Therefore, while courts have adopted the McDonnell Douglas test for FEHA employment discrimination cases that don’t involve mixed motives, the supreme court found it shouldn’t govern mixed-motives cases, where the employee bears only an initial burden of showing discrimination “was a substantial factor motivating his or her termination. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Note: The parenthetical dates following each author’s name refer to his or her tenure on the Court. [read post]