Search for: "Hicks v. Hand"
Results 61 - 80
of 131
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2015, 8:31 am
Hicks, 55 S.W.3d 515 (Tenn. 2001) (finding that a checkpoint had an improper purpose in part because “the record shows that at least one officer on the scene possessed and used a drug dog”); United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:50 am
I can see the value of public health and the importance of weaning people away from pouring cash into the hands high street chain ‘Subway’s’ £2.75 an hour ‘Apprentice Sandwich Artists’, but I cant quite see why this is the role of a social landlord. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 7:27 am
The appeal decision in Groia v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
(More disclosure: I am also one of the lawyers for David Hicks). [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:12 am
In two prior cases, Illinois v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 8:27 am
The Tennessee Court of appeals recently affirmed a jury’s defense verdict in a rear-end car crash case in Hicks v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 10:17 am
In a lesson about using “flimsy grounds” for stopping people on suspicion of texting while driving, an Ontario Superior Court judge has thrown out an alcohol-related conviction after a cop stopped a driver he thought had a cellphone in his hand while at a red light.The officer “clearly operated on a hunch,” says Richard Litkowski, an associate at Hicks Adams LLP who represented Imran Mughal on the appeal of his conviction in R. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 6:21 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 5:25 pm
In People v Hicks, the arrest of an individual, and any search made incident to the arrest, are unlawful unless supported by probable cause. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
An interesting case is Hicks v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 6:17 pm
William (V - Western Michigan)Tuttle, The Rev. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 2:03 am
The second decision, Fine & Country Ltd & others v Okotoks Ltd & another [2012] EWHC 2230 (Ch) (a decision handed down by Chancery Division (England and Wales) new boy Mr Justice Hildyard on the last day of July, is quite another matter. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:52 am
Reaching back to Hicks v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:38 pm
For example, Mathews v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:11 pm
Hicks, 438 Fed. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 12:27 pm
Hicks, 438 Fed. [read post]
