Search for: "Hicks v. Perry"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2012, 2:34 pm
Earlier today the Court issued a per curiam opinion in the Texas redistricting case, Perry v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 11:44 am
Perry, 2018 U.S. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 1:53 pm
Perry, Judge. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 1:50 pm
Perry, Judge. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 1:38 pm
Eliot Kim summarized the Second Circuit’s ruling in Linde v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 5:00 pm
’” Hicks v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
See Hicks v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 11:23 am
Hicks v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 12:12 pm
For publication opinions today (6): In James Hicks v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 12:31 pm
Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 515-18 (2006) (Scalia, J., dissenting in part). [3] Romer v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 9:00 am
In one, Hicks v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Although summary dismissals do have precedential value (meaning that they have to be followed), they lose that force “when doctrinal developments indicate otherwise,” as the Court held in Hicks v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
Hicks (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist.] [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 8:25 am
Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:16 pm
., whether B less than PL.United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 7:28 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 9:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
