Search for: "Hicks v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 215
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2011, 4:39 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:06 am
This is my second post on United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:32 am
(Orin Kerr) This is my second post on United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 8:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 11:12 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:54 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 5:04 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 5:59 am
Brief of the United States, U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 10:02 am
(Orin Kerr) The case is United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:23 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:35 pm
State Bar gave Rick something of a victory, though the release of the records is by no means guaranteed:Appellants Richard Sander, Joe Hicks and the California First Amendment Coalition seek access to admissions records from the State Bar of California (the Bar), subject to conditions designed to ensure the privacy of bar applicants, in order to conduct academic research on discrepancies in bar passage rates among racial and ethnic groups. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:00 am
When I registered at The United States Sentencing Commission seminar, I got the same jolt to the system as I got the first time I stepped into a federal courtroom. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 10:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:47 am
United States Court of Appeals Evidence Other acts Where the defendant charged with distributing drugs did not put his intent at issue, it was error to admit evidence of prior drug convictions. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:00 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:46 pm
This week we have two more opinions out of the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky involving the MSP. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 6:39 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 5:02 am
Ten years later, in State v. [read post]
