Search for: "Hiers v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm by Nietzer
Sterling Chemicals (5th Cir. 10/13/11) (successor Liability/Amendment of ERISA Plan through Asset Purchase Agreement in bankruptcy); Hier die Entscheidung: In the United States Court of Appeals for the fifth circuit US v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 1:59 am by Nietzer
Aufgepasst; völliger Haftungsausschluss bei Vertragsbruch auch in den USA nicht zulässig; hier sogar mit enormem Strafschadensersatz belegt (dieser wird eventuell in zweiter Instanz reduziert): Sixth Circuit Affirms $33M Jury Verdict in Breach of Contract Case (Whitesell Corp. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 11:30 am
Plaintiff WinWare is represented by Thomas, Kayden, Horstemeyer & Risley, LLP of Atlanta.Peach State Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:18 pm
Das Prinzip bezieht sich hier auf die Relation zwischen Aktion (Völkerrechtsverletzung) eines Staates und der erlaubten Reaktion eines anderen Staates. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:42 am
In diesem Spannungsverhältnis liegt die hier aufgearbeitete rechtliche Auseinandersetzung über Vorbehalte zu menschenrechtlichen Verträgen. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 11:34 pm by Kluwer UPC News blogger
When the Member States of the EPC entered into an association, they completely disregarded the obligations imposed on them for many years by national constitutional law, by the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) – for all member states – as well as, for all EU member states, by the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 2:09 am by JR Chaves
Lo que hiere la razón jurídica, y me quedó claro de mis tiempos de monaguillo, es que los pecados veniales no deben merecer mayor castigo que los pecados capitales. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:38 am by Veronika Gaertner
Celní úrad Tabor) -  the English abstract reads as follows: The dogma that claims of the State based on its penal, revenue or other public law are not enforceable abroad – a doctrine also known as the revenue rule – is more and more displaced by European instruments obliging the Member States to collect public law claims of their fellow Member States. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:45 am by Otto Spijkers
It believed with the defendants that the State of the Netherlands had 'effective control' over the peacekeepers at the relevant times and for the relevant acts. [read post]