Search for: "Higgins v. People"
Results 81 - 100
of 119
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
RSC spokesman Brian Staessle remarked upon retracting the brief that ”we hope people will now use this opportunity to engage in polite and serious discussion of copyright law. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:16 am
Blog: Head of Legal blog Twitter: @carlgardner David Allen Green: Solicitor Solicitor and legal correspondent of The New Statesman, David is best known for his Jack of Kent blog and as the solicitor leading the Twitter Joke Trial Firm: Preiskel Blog: Jack of Kent Twitter: @davidallengreen Nichola Higgins: Barrister at Doughty Street Chambers Former Chair of the YBC. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:21 am
The cases decided to date are People (DPP) v Cunningham [2012] IECCA 64, People (DPP) v Kavanagh [2012] IECCA 65, and People (DPP) v Barry O’Brien [2012] IECCA 68, and in each case the Court of Criminal Appeal has overturned the original conviction and ordered retrials. [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:46 pm
But even if it's just treated as symbolic expression, it is still constitutionally protected, as cases such as Texas v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 6:51 am
” Higgins v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:20 am
” His message was clear: discrimination, of any kind, must not be tolerated in a “government of the people, by the people, for the people. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
Dee V Benson, US Dist. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
DMCA safe harbors don’t protect such service providers.10 Inducement, as described by the Supreme Court in MGM v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:00 pm
Supreme Court decision, Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
But using history appropriately is about more than finding nice sounding quotes from important people. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 12:49 pm
When most people think of a First-to-File patent system, they would probably think it means exactly what it says (the first person to file the patent application has priority). [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 6:08 am
(Part One) – http://tinyurl.com/3p8hbzp (eDiscovery Team) A Timely Warning to Employees About Social Media – http://tinyurl.com/3vjacww (Amanda Bronstad) Baglow v Smith – The Increasing Importance of Context in Defamation Claims - http://tinyurl.com/44pmecq (Bob Tarantino) Connecticut Courts Weigh In on Social Media as Evidence – http://tinyurl.com/3hgy34v (Marie Grady) D.C. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:11 pm
The Pledge that Graham proposes is very simply written: No first use of software patents against companies with less than 25 people. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:23 pm
BPAI Statistics Schmirler v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:47 pm
Paul V. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:47 am
Lest anyone think this is merely a poor choice by a panel from the 10th Circuit, consider the decision of the California Supreme Court in People v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:34 am
Duffy was co-counsel in the important Supreme Court case KSR v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:07 am
The increase can be seen as a consequence of the decision in eBay v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:35 am
City of Panora v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 2:41 pm
CEO pay v. median employee pay – Lynn says this caused the most confusion and uproar. [read post]
