Search for: "Hill v. Barker" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2011, 7:12 pm by Dr Mark Summerfield
The court considered the application of the principle of ‘purposive construction’, derived originally from the words of Lord Diplock in the UK case of Catnic Components Ltd v Hill & Smith Ltd [1982] RPC 183. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 5:14 am by Walter Olson
[Drug Store News] More: Lela Barker, Cosmetics Design. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 10:32 am
The Court applied the analytical framework as articulated in Barker v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 10:18 am
(See, e.g., Wilkinson v Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc., 920 F2d 1560 [11th Cir 1991]; Hill v Spiegel, Inc., 708 F2d 233, 237 [6th Cir 1983]). [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 6:21 am
The Court must also apply the four-part test articulated in Barker v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 3:18 am
Constitutional Claim: The Court focused on the benchmark test that applies to constitutional speedy trial claims from Barker v. [read post]
24 Dec 2021, 6:26 am
Hill-Rom: New Lessons on Material Adverse Effect Clauses Posted by Robert T. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm by Michael Zischke
Statutory and Categorical Exemptions Berkeley Hills Watershed Coalition v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Barber, Bryant Barchet, Alison Barker, Michele Barnard, Pat Barnes, Ruthlyn M. [read post]