Search for: "Hill v. California" Results 81 - 100 of 1,320
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2022, 11:49 pm by Whittel & Melton, LLC
Según los informes, el viernes, los detectives de Cherry Hill acusaron a Busey, quien vive en Malibú, California, de dos cargos de contacto sexual criminal en cuarto grado, un cargo de intento criminal/contacto sexual criminal en cuarto grado, y un cargo de acoso. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
Events On 29 November 2022, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is hosting a virtual talk on “Contemporary First Amendment Politics” at the California State University. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
(For more evidence of lawyerly shabbiness in earlier stages of Moore v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 9:15 am by Quinta Jurecic
Glenn Youngkin commented at a rally immediately afterward, “There’s no room for violence anywhere, but we’re going to send [Pelosi] back to be with him in California. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Below is my column in the Hill on today’s argument in the two college affirmative action cases in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Since declaring affirmative action in admissions to be unconstitutional in 1978 in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Not surprisingly, I don’t see any persuasive argument for giving Wyoming and California equal voting power. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 9:04 pm by Katie Cohen
But experts say that the Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am by John Floyd
Lucey: Right to effective assistance of counsel extended to appeal process. 1985 Hill v. [read post]
CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There are no CEQA cases pending at the California Supreme Court. 3. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]