Search for: "Hill v. Department of Corrections" Results 41 - 60 of 319
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2007, 7:11 am
Although the State possesses a "strong interest in enforcing its criminal judgments without undue interference from the federal courts," Hill v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 1:58 am
  IRB noted that the requirements to prove losses under the double proviso clause were those set out in Hill v Mercantile & General and Equitas v R&Q (previously blogged here), which together required the reinsured to prove, as a matter of law, that the settlements were within the terms of the inwards policy and the outwards policy; the requisite standard of proof being on the balance of probabilities. [read post]
14 May 2010, 1:58 am
  IRB noted that the requirements to prove losses under the double proviso clause were those set out in Hill v Mercantile & General and Equitas v R&Q (previously blogged here), which together required the reinsured to prove, as a matter of law, that the settlements were within the terms of the inwards policy and the outwards policy; the requisite standard of proof being on the balance of probabilities. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Michigan Court Rules that Juveniles Sentenced to Life Have Right to Parole: A year after the ACLU filed suit in Hill v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
Hill, Fifth Circuit: Appellant was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 10:06 am by WSLL
Summary of Decision January 9, 2013Justice Hill delivered the opinion for the Court. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 6:05 am
Bloomfield Hills School District (No. 137607), to the Michigan Association for Justice; and in Hoover v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Jan. 22, 2019 Grine, J.), the court entered summary judgment in favor of a defendant landowner under the Hills and Ridges Doctrine. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 4:09 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Appellate Court Compensation Case Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 8:05 am by Andrew Hamm
” Briefly: Following Lucia v. [read post]