Search for: "Hill v. District Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,772
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2018, 7:44 am
Azar, (D CO, Dec. 10, 2018), a Colorado federal district court held that the mandate violates plaintiffs' rights under RFRA. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 3:30 am
In December, virtually the same issue was before the same court, once again by Tower Hill. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 9:53 pm
In Hill v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:33 am
Somerset Hills School District: The IDEA prescribes a 2 year statute of limitations. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
In Hill v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 6:26 pm
The temporary restraining order (full text) in State of Washington v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 1:09 pm
Cavender In the case of CH2M Hill Engineers, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Pam KarlanRick Hills's recent post over at Prawfsblawg on the Supreme Court's decision in Riley v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 10:28 am
Mango Hill Condominium Association 12, Inc. (3D10-2014), the Third District again reversed a trial court's order compelling appraisal so that the trial court could first determine whether the insured had complied with its post loss obligations. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:31 am
Green, 46 F.3d 347, 356 (4th Cir. 1995)(citing Hill, 474 U.S. at 59-60) overruled on other grounds by O’Dell v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 5:04 pm
Beverly Hills Unified School District v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:33 am
Bethune-Hill; and a reviewability of agency decision case, Smith v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 7:46 am
Editor’s Note: Thanks to the RLUIPA Defense Blog for this post: http://www.rluipa-defense.com/ On March 27, 2015, the Southern District of New York granted summary judgment in favor of all defendants in the consolidated action Bernstein v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 10:26 pm
Bennett v Hill, 2015 WL 446551 (MT 2/3/2105) The opinion can be accessed at: https://mtlawlibrary.wordpress.com/2015/02/04/opinion-bennett-et-al-v-hill-et-al/Filed under: Current Caselaw, Nuisance Tagged: golf course, spite fence [read post]
11 May 2016, 8:00 am
Uppal v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 11:14 am
In the Federal Western District Court of Pennsylvania case of Acuity v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 10:36 am
The California Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District, recently reversed a trial court judgment entered in favor of the City of Morgan Hill pursuant to California's anti-SLAPP statute (Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16.) [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 3:32 pm
In Johnson v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am
Federal District Court of Illinois (Central District) lawsuit, the initial question to be answered was whether Wexford’s financial condition could be investigated through discovery; this was answered mostly by the case of Zazu Design v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 8:00 am
Anita Martin for Marlene Hill v. [read post]
