Search for: "Hill v. Federal Trade Commission"
Results 1 - 20
of 212
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2019, 9:15 am
This week on Capitol Hill and vicinity, the Supreme Court issues its decision in Iancu v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Pam KarlanRick Hills's recent post over at Prawfsblawg on the Supreme Court's decision in Riley v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 7:32 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 12:21 pm
The Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) recently released Policy Statement on unfair methods of competition (UMC) has a number of profound problems, which I will detail below. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 5:35 am
Cuban drew on his own experience during the SEC’s unsuccessful insider trading action against him to argue that the use of administrative law judges in complex litigation such as insider trading cases is unfair and against the public interest (Hill v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 10:39 am
Gianakas v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:51 am
If the gentleman will permit, the Federal trade commission differs from the Interstate Commerce Commission in that it has no affirmative power to say what shall be done in the future? [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 4:01 pm
Ayana Hill v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 2:45 am
The Eastern District of Texas says "maybe," according to a post about a recent ruling in a patent case, Hill v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 4:07 pm
Under Federal law, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has power to regulate Made in the USA labeling. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 10:38 am
The panel then stated that the unfairness analysis primarily relied on six factors laid out in another case, Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 11:20 am
This quarterly survey reviews efforts to regulate the Internet and broadband at the Federal Communications Commission, the Federal Trade Commission, the Copyright Office, the Library of Congress, the Department of Justice, the Department of Commerce, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Homeland Security, and on Capitol Hill. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 4:11 am
[Riggs, Daily Caller] “Law and Society Boycott Resolution Gets Arizona Immigration Law Wrong” [Chin, Prawfs] “Appeal of Crunch Berries Case Dismissed” [Lowering the Bar, earlier] “Senior U.N. official” demanding end to U.S. use of drones against Al Qaeda in Afghanistan also happens to be NYU lawprof [NY Times, 16th/last paragraph of story] Unintended consequences: 1932 cut in judges’ pensions changed Supreme Court history [Magliocca, ConcurOp] Tags:… [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 8:28 am
The lame duck is not yet dead, and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is supposed to be an independent agency. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
Sources: Order in Charles Hill v SEC Federal Judge Rules SEC In-House Judge’s Appointment ‘Likely Unconstitutional’ by Jean Eaglesham in the Wall Street Journal Initial administrative order In the Matter of Charles L. [read post]
20 May 2022, 11:01 am
Welcome to the FTC UMC Roundup, our new weekly update of news and events relating to antitrust and, more specifically, to the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) newfound interest in “revitalizing” the field. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 7:17 pm
Today, the North Carolina Business Court ruled in Hill v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 1:09 pm
” Benjamin of Forest Hills Realty, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 5:28 pm
Among the federal regulators that has proven to be active in data breach arena has been the Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
