Search for: "Hill v. General Motors Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 80
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2008, 8:16 pm
General Motors revenue was down 45% in October alone, and its stock price has dropped down to where it was half a century ago. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 8:36 am by PaulKostro
Amerada Hess Corp., 168 N.J. 236, 254 (2001) (quoting Amerada Hess Corp. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
  However, Hill went beyond Dumas and, even assuming that a lost chance claim could exist generally, refused to apply it to product liability cases:[T]he lost chance doctrine, even when recognized, has been limited to medical malpractice cases. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 11:58 am
The statutory scheme, which is "designed to promote prompt payment of legitimate claims" (Nyack Hospital v General Motors Acceptance Corp., 8 NY3d 294), is better served by defendant taking final action after receipt of a response to a verification request - even if finds that the request [sic] is inadequate. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:24 am
Miles, Posner on Economic Loss in Tort: EVRA Corp v Swiss Bank, 74 U Chi L Rev 1813 (2007) Martha Nussbaum, Carr, Before and After: Power and Sex in Carr v Allison Gas Turbine Division, General Motors Corp, 74 U Chi L Rev 1831 (2007) Randal C. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Ariane de Vogue at CNN and Lydia Wheeler at The Hill. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
Tokai Corp., 2 S.W.3d 251, 257-58 (Tex. 1999); General Motors Corp. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 12:33 pm by Steven M. Gursten
Larry Carrier and Allied Automotive Group, Indemnitor of General Motors Corp. was released just before midnight on Sunday, August 1, 2010. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am by Marie Louise
(EDTexweblog.com) Otis – Repeated failure to comply with discovery obligations warrants terminating and evidentiary sanctions: Shindler Elevator Corp. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
Here, the affidavit states that Elrac is in the business of renting motor vehicles to the general public, that it uses rental agreements which are created in the regular course of business and that it rented the vehicle involved in the accident to Mr. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
B-Roc Reps., Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) TTAB dismisses 2(d) opposition, finding BELL HILL for wine and BELL’S for beer too dissimilar: Bell's Brewery, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am by Kelly
(PatLit) Judgment of similarity of designs in China (Class 99) Denmark When toilet seats make impressions on their users: Duravit AG v B&N Developing ApS (Class 99) Europe European patent – Further steps to enhanced cooperation (EPLAW) (IPJUR) (IPKat) (inovia) (IAM) General Court: More absolute grounds: KOMPRESSOR PLUS (Class 46) General Court confirms likelihood of confusion: Bianchin v OHMI – Grotto (GASOLINE) (Class 46) General Court… [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Mazda Motor Am., 21 No. 12 Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage 3, Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage December 23, 2010The American Association for Justice says in an amicus brief filed with the U.S. [read post]