Search for: "Hill v. General Motors Corporation"
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2014, 10:22 am
General Motors has received a lot of media attention lately, and for good reason. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 8:36 am
BHAGAT, Indiv. and as Shareholder of ABB PROPERTIES CORPORATION, A New Jersey Corporation and as a shareholder of EASTERNER MOTOR INN, INC., a New Jersey Corporation v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 8:07 pm
(Ilya Somin) In a recent post on Kaur v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
The syllabus is constructed with these general ideas in mind. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:01 am
Federal Elections Commission regarding campaign contributions: "Corporations are not individuals in that regard, otherwise, having elected General Eisenhower as president we maybe will be electing General Motors as president, it makes that much sense. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm
Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 8:49 am
In Hill v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
However, Hill went beyond Dumas and, even assuming that a lost chance claim could exist generally, refused to apply it to product liability cases:[T]he lost chance doctrine, even when recognized, has been limited to medical malpractice cases. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 2:00 am
General Elec. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
B-Roc Reps., Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) TTAB dismisses 2(d) opposition, finding BELL HILL for wine and BELL’S for beer too dissimilar: Bell's Brewery, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 10:49 am
Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
General Motors Corp., 141 F.3d 714, 720 (7th Cir. 1998) (disallowing opinion of expert witness, who “lacked any scientific basis for an opinion about … motives,” about defendant’s failure to add safety measure in order to “save money”); In re Diet Drugs Prods. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:34 am
General Motors Corporation, et al., No. 2013 IL App (1st) 121566-U. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
(PatLit) Judgment of similarity of designs in China (Class 99) Denmark When toilet seats make impressions on their users: Duravit AG v B&N Developing ApS (Class 99) Europe European patent – Further steps to enhanced cooperation (EPLAW) (IPJUR) (IPKat) (inovia) (IAM) General Court: More absolute grounds: KOMPRESSOR PLUS (Class 46) General Court confirms likelihood of confusion: Bianchin v OHMI – Grotto (GASOLINE) (Class 46) General Court… [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
Exch. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:46 am
MANN v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:46 am
MANN v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 10:38 am
Hill v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Here is why (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Innovative methods for corporate legal managers to reduce IP counsel costs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) The malign and the benign of the transfer of know-how (IP finance) How to avoid potential conflict when inventors want their innovations back (Technology Transfer Tactics) 50% of venture capital investment is lost: How your clients can improve these odds by using the right patent analytics (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) New website, Intellogist, compares… [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 1:58 am
Ciba Vision Corp (KEI) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Freescale Semiconductor – Constitutionality of mandatory stay pending ITC investigation questioned in Freescale Semiconductor v Zoran Corporation (Docket Report) Optics Planet – Court orders hearing to quantify fees for defendants’ contempt: Optics Planet, Inc. v. [read post]