Search for: "Hill v. Harper" Results 21 - 40 of 82
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2011, 6:35 am by Nabiha Syed
Tom Goldstein of this blog discusses National Meat Association v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At The Hill (via How Appealing), Harper Neidig reports that Mark Janus, “[a]n anti-union advocate who won a landmark Supreme Court case two years ago is now asking the court to order a public sector labor group to pay back the union dues that it had ruled unconstitutional. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” At Nahmod Law, Sheldon Nahmod looks at a cert petition asking the court to decide whether the former Illinois government worker who prevailed in Janus v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 2:33 pm by Howard Knopf
Acuff-Rose decision rejected the interpretation that he is trying to promote in Canada regarding the nine year older Harper v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At The Hill, John Kruzel and Harper Neidig report that “[t]he Supreme Court will hear a slate of highly charged disputes when the justices return to the bench in the new year and resume one of the most politically volatile terms in recent memory. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Amy Howe
Coverage relating to the nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to succeed the late Justice Antonin Scalia comes from Adam Liptak in The New York Times, David Cohen of Politico, Eric Lipton of The New York Times, Amber Phillips of The Washington Post (with another story here), Harper Neidig of The Hill, and  Kristen East of Politico. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 11:42 am by Matt Van Steenkiste
In McDonald v Asset Acceptance it was held that a third party debt buyer (Asset Acceptance and Cavalry are very similar in this respect) may not charge interest for the period of time post charge off. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:16 am by Bexis
  What was that that Robert Harper said about the XYZ affair? [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am by Rachel Sachs
At Cato@Liberty, Jim Harper discusses Tuesday’s oral argument in Maryland v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Harper Neidig at The Hill, At the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Ruthann Robson suggests that “because Chief Justice Roberts has chosen to make this statement, his choices of when not to make similar statements is now a very legitimate subject of debate. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 8:32 am by Kalvis Golde
” At the Harvard Law Review Blog, Aaron Tang suggests that there is an issue lurking in Espinoza v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 3:38 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Hill, Harper Neidig and John Kruzel highlight “the five most-anticipated decisions pending before the court. [read post]