Search for: "Hill v. Levy" Results 41 - 60 of 125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Gerald Kogan looks at Jones v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 5:43 pm by Colin O'Keefe
-Hartford attorney Daniel Schwartz of Pullman & Comley in his Connecticut Employment Law Blog Supreme Court Affirms Kappos v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
” Horvitz & Levy’s At the Lectern blog notes that the justices also declined to review “the California Supreme Court’s decision in People v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am by Rachel Sachs
” Wednesday’s oral argument in Shelby County v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 8:32 am
Levy, senior fellow in constitutional studies at the Cato Institute. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:39 am by admin
      Under the California system of financing as it existed until the 1970’s, different school districts could levy taxes and generate vastly different revenues; because of the difference in property values, the same property tax rate would yield widely differing sums in, for example, Beverly Hills and Baldwin Park. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 4:37 am
’ The song referred to Rainey as a second `Bobby Hill,’ a former Itawamba football coach who was arrested and accused of sending explicit text messages to a minor in 2009. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 5:45 am
Summary of Decision issued January 29, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Krenning v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 3:19 pm by WSLL
Summary of Decision issued November 12, 2009 Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Hill, 147 N.E.2d 321, 325 (Ill. 1958) (“a vested right to punitive, exemplary, vindictive or aggravated damages arises only when such damages have been allowed by a judgment); Langford v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Hill, 147 N.E.2d 321, 325 (Ill. 1958) (“a vested right to punitive, exemplary, vindictive or aggravated damages arises only when such damages have been allowed by a judgment); Langford v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:27 am by Lovechilde
 We’ve seen bridges fall and levies break. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 8:32 am by Kalvis Golde
” At the Harvard Law Review Blog, Aaron Tang suggests that there is an issue lurking in Espinoza v. [read post]