Search for: "Hill v. Lockhart"
Results 21 - 28
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2010, 6:40 pm
Moore’s arguments Moore argues that, although Strickland, Hill, and a third case – Kimmelman v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:18 pm
—-, 2010 WL 1222274 (2010); Hill v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 12:39 pm
WASHINGTON, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); HILL V. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:30 pm
Lockhart, yet no “flood” of challenges followed that ruling. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 9:30 am
App. 2008), citing Hill v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 4:07 pm
Allison, 431 U.S. 63 Then we come to Hill v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 11:21 am
Lockhart-Bembery v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 4:44 am
Lockhart, 883 F.2d 654, 656-57 (8th Cir. 1989) (holding that visual body cavity searches of prison inmates conducted within view of four to six other inmates did not violate the Fourth Amendment because any measures taken to increase privacy would implicate legitimate prison security concerns); see also Hill v. [read post]
