Search for: "Hill v. Mance"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2018, 3:39 am
The case of Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1989] AC 53 is not authority for the proposition that the police enjoy a general immunity from suit in respect of anything done by them in the course of investigating or preventing crime. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am
On Tuesday 7 November, the Supreme Court (Lady Hale and Lords Walker, Brown, Mance, and Dyson) heard the appeal of the parents of a young woman, Melanie Rabone, who committed suicide while on home release from a psychiatric unit at Stepping Hill Hospital. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
From Monday 7 to Wednesday 9 March 2011, Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale, and Lords Mance and Collins will hear Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 1:21 am
The majority, however, buries Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [1989] AC 53 – whose public policy justifications have been inverted. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
This article was posted on 6KBW College Hill’s blog, here. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:25 am
Hill, an appeal from the Court of Appeal of Trinidad and Tobago to be heard by Lady Hale and Lords Phillips, Mance, Dyson, and Wilson. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:33 am
Savage; Powell v United Kingdom [2000] 30 EHRR CD 362). [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 1:00 am
This appeal considered whether the ‘Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police’ immunity, which protects the police from claims when in the course of their core duties they negligently cause injuries to passers-by, applies in a case where the relevant police act was a positive act. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:27 am
Lady Hale, Lord Brown and Lord Mance each add further comments of their own. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 1:09 am
Jonathan Mance: The Protection of Rights – this way, that way, forwards, backwards…: Lord Mance’s 2022 Sir Thomas More Lecture, organised by the Euro Group of Lincoln’s Inn. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm
It is here - the Supreme Court's decision in Eli Lilly v Actavis UK [2017] UKSC 48. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:59 am
Today the court handed down its reasons for those conclusions, the unanimous decision being given by its President, Lord Neuberger, and the other Supreme Court justices, Lords Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Hodge, agreeing with it. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 3:00 am
It is a flagrant violation of Brady v. [read post]
