Search for: "Hill v. Mitchell" Results 41 - 60 of 128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2018, 1:51 pm by Giles Peaker
The first is the concern, articulated in X v Bedfordshire in relation to social services and in Hill v West Yorkshire in relation to the police, that liability in negligence will complicate decision-making in a difficult and sensitive field, and potentially divert the social worker or police officer into defensive decision-making. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 2:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Lunch SESSION V: IDENTIFYING GAPS IN THE EVIDENTIARY BASESession Objectives:• Highlight evidentiary gaps that, if filled, would help inform potential approaches for health care providers. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:17 am by Quinta Jurecic
Robert Hannigan, Former Director, United Kingdom Government Communications HeadquartersMike Rogers, Commander, US Cyber Command; Director, National Security Agency Moderator: David Ignatius, Associate Editor and Columnist, The Washington Post   That Was ThenMichael Collins, Deputy Assistant Director, East Asia Mission Center, Central Intelligence AgencyBonnie Glaser, Senior Advisor for Asia; Director, China Power Project, Center for Strategic and International StudiesKenichiro Sasae,… [read post]
17 May 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
A Pennsylvania Facebook Discovery decision from last August of 2016 has been brought to my attention.In the case Hanna v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:00 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Mitchell Pickerill points out that when asking whether the Roberts Court is “pro-business” we must also consider what we would expect from this, or any court. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 12:15 pm
Bertsch reached the intersection as Brett and Mitchell were coming down the hill. [read post]
26 May 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Kevin LaCroix] “Insider Trading: The Unknowable Crime” [Thaya Brook Knight and Ilya Shapiro on Cato amicus brief in Salman v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
More coverage of Monday’s decision in Evenwel v. [read post]