Search for: "Hill v. Patterson"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2019, 7:29 am
Hill v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 9:27 am
Patterson. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
The Court wrote another opinion on the medical literature Daubert issue last year in Hill v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 9:55 pm
In one recent set of Replies I received the following cases were referred to: Bailey v IBC Vehicles Ltd, Cole v News Group Newspapers, Carpenter v Mid-Kent Healthcare Trust, William Patterson v Cape Darlington & Ors, Mattel Inc & Ors v RSW Group plc, Ghannouchi v Houni, Francis v Francis and Dickerson, Smith Graham v The Lord Chancellor’s Department and Crane v Canons Leisure Centre. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The Court summarized the law on vested rights in New York as follows: " a vested right can be acquired when, pursuant to a legally issued permit, the landowner demonstrates a commitment to the purpose for which the permit was granted by effecting substantial changes and incurring substantial expenses to further the development" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d 41, 47; see Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d 542, 544; Matter of Lefrak Forest… [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:33 am
In Waggoner v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 9:14 am
The court in the case of Wheeling Park Commission v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 9:14 am
The court in the case of Wheeling Park Commission v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:03 pm
Vigorito, Barker, Patterson, Nichols & Porter, LLP, Valhalla, NY (Leilani J. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:03 pm
Vigorito, Barker, Patterson, Nichols & Porter, LLP, Valhalla, NY (Leilani J. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The Court summarized the law on vested rights in New York as follows: " a vested right can be acquired when, pursuant to a legally issued permit, the landowner demonstrates a commitment to the purpose for which the permit was granted by effecting substantial changes and incurring substantial expenses to further the development" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d 41, 47; see Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d 542, 544; Matter of Lefrak Forest… [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 9:16 am
In the case, Bertsch v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 9:16 am
In the case, Bertsch v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:52 am
Patterson v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
Ct. 1145 (2002)........................................................ 5 Hill v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:53 am
” In an op-ed at The Hill, A. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:19 am
Cooley and Nobles v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 9:13 pm
(Steve Patterson, "Court says $27 million crash award too much", Chicago Sun-Times, Nov. 23). [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 10:08 am
The case, called Patterson v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 12:37 pm
Patterson, Thuente, Skaar & Christensen, P.A., 2009 WL 5185770 (D. [read post]
