Search for: "Hill v. Tennessee Valley Authority" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2022, 2:16 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Fish & Wildlife Service declares the little fish that almost stopped completion of the Tellico Dam ha recovered. ] The snail darter, the small freshwater fish made famous by Tennessee Valley Authority v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
Tennessee Valley Authority, in which the justices considered whether an implied discretionary function exception bars a negligence claim against the TVA, Azar v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Tennessee Valley Authority, in which the justices will decide whether an implied discretionary function exception bars a negligence claim against the TVA. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am by Maureen Johnston
Jewell 14-377Issue: (1) Whether the United States Fish and Wildlife Service is obligated, under the Endangered Species Act, to demonstrate how a reasonable and prudent alternative to any federal agency action that is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a protected species or adversely modify its critical habitat is economically feasible; if so, whether it can ignore the devastating impacts on the human community caused by the alternative's implementation, as the Ninth Circuit held… [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:57 am by Steve Davies
The Court held that the rule of Tennessee Valley Authority, requiring repeal of a law to be explicit, did not apply because section 318 did not repeal, but “amended” or changed the environmental laws applicable to a specific case and therefore did not violate the constitutional prerogative of the courts. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:35 pm by David Doniger
America Electric Power, eight states, New York City, and three private land trusts sued five electric power companies – American Electric Power, Southern Company, Duke Energy, Tennessee Valley Authority, and Xcel – that are the nation’s largest emitters of heat-trapping carbon dioxide. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
The proposed settlement was entered into under the authority granted EPA in Section 122(h) of CERCLA, and requires the Respondents to pay $600,000.00 to the Hazardous Substances Superfund in settlement of past costs. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]