Search for: "Hillerich "
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2015, 7:30 am
Hillerich & Bradsby Co. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
Maybe Hillerich’s application will ultimately be denied. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 7:33 am
It also has images of the patents for the first baseball bats, gloves and balls, filed by John Hillerich of Louisville Ky (his bat company is the maker of the Louisville Slugger); George Rawlings (baseball glove patent from 1885) and Benjamin Shibe, known as the Edison of Baseball (a baseball with a cork center in 1909). [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 2:51 pm
Hillerich & Bradsby Co., 78 F.2d 763 (5th Cir. 1935), that the unauthorized use of famous baseball players’ names in block letter form on baseball bats could constitute an infringement of the rights of the plaintiff, which manufactured bats authorized by the players to bear facsimiles of their autographs: In contrast with appellee’s use of autographs of players which very naturally imply an [e]ndorsement of the bat, appellant’s use of the… [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:37 am
Hillerich & Bradsby Co., 78 F.2d 763 (5th Cir. 1935), that the unauthorized use of famous baseball players’ names in block letter form on baseball bats could constitute an infringement of the rights of the plaintiff, which manufactured bats authorized by the players to bear facsimiles of their autographs: In contrast with appellee’s use of autographs of players which very naturally imply an [e]ndorsement of the bat, appellant’s use of the… [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:37 am
Hillerich & Bradsby Co., 78 F.2d 763 (5th Cir. 1935), that the unauthorized use of famous baseball players’ names in block letter form on baseball bats could constitute an infringement of the rights of the plaintiff, which manufactured bats authorized by the players to bear facsimiles of their autographs: In contrast with appellee’s use of autographs of players which very naturally imply an [e]ndorsement of the bat, appellant’s use of the… [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 12:53 pm
” If you do end up with one of the Justice Blackmun dolls, be warned: (1) the baseball pictured with the doll is not included (the idea is that the doll can display you own favorite baseball or golf ball — there is a hole in the base that can accommodate a golf tee); and (2) the included baseball bat (a tiny Louisville Slugger legitimately licensed by the nice people at Hillerich & Bradsby) connects to the doll via magnets concealed in the Justice’s elbow and the… [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:45 am
The incident left him brain-damaged and today, at age 18, he is still unable to perform daily functions independently. (1) The Domalewskis filed a suit in 2008 against Hillerich & Bradsby Co., manufacturers of the Louisville Slugger bat; The Sports Authority, retailer that sells the bats; and the New Jersey Little League. (2) Although at the time of the accident Steven was playing in a Police Athletic League ballgame, the Domalewskis sued the New Jersey Little League because, according… [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 12:46 pm
The settling defendants were Hillerich and Bradsby (the manufacturers of the Louisville Slugger), the Sports Authority, and Little League baseball. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 7:35 am
According to the Star-Ledger, the suit targeted Hillerich & Bradsby, makers of Louisville Sluggers; Little League, Inc., which approved use of the bat; and The Sports Authority, which sold the bat. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 10:27 pm
page=all And yet some haters are accusing the family of Steven Domalewski of having filed a frivolous lawsuit against the manufacturer of Louisville Slugger bats, Hillerich & Bradsby Co. of Kentucky; retailer The Sports Authority; and the New Jersey Little League. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 9:47 pm
Steven’s family’s lawsuit named a number of defendants, including: bat maker Hillerich & Bradsby Co.; The Sports Authority Inc.; Little League Inc.; and the New Jersey Little League. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:59 am
He represents companies such as The Burton Corporation and Hillerich & Bradsby, promoters of sporting events, and others involved in the industry.Brian is a frequent lecturer and contributor to publications on topics ranging from intellectual property to sports marketing and has been named a New York Super Lawyer for Sports and Entertainment 2009-2012. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:48 am
Hillerich & Bradsby Co., Case No. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:37 am
Hillerich & Bradsby, the plaintiffs maintained, marketed the bat based upon “profit-driven motivations, and was consciously indifferent to the dangers which the bat posed. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:45 am
Hillerich & Bradsby Co., Case No. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 7:23 am
Hillerich & Bradsby Co., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-422-H (W.D. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 2:48 pm
Hillerich & Bradsby Co., No. 2011 MT 175, slip op. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 7:20 am
Hillerich & Bradsby Co., Debbie and Duane Patch sued the maker of the aluminum bat that was used in the game that killed Brandon Patch in 2003. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 7:30 am
Hillerich & Bradsby Co., 2011 MT 175 (July 21, 2011). [read post]
