Search for: "Hills v. Department of Revenue"
Results 1 - 20
of 119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2020, 4:15 am
Planned Parenthood, (Docket No. 19-677) and Hill v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:45 pm
Department of Agriculture asking for information about revenue that retailers receive from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the federal food stamp program paid for by taxpayers.Read more here. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 10:44 am
Florida Dep't of Revenue (state taxation) Chamblin v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:20 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 10:38 am
McNamee v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 6:16 am
On July 9, 2021, Vice Chancellor Slights of the Delaware Court of Chancery, in Bardy Diagnostics, Inc. v Hill-Rom, Inc. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 10:07 am
Case Name: MERIT ENERGY COMPANY v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 10:01 am
Between 1980 and 1985, Lord Carnwath was Junior Counsel to the Inland Revenue. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 4:38 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 8:06 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, John V. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am
Montana Department of Revenue to invalidate a tax-credit program benefiting families who send their children to private schools, including religious schools, contending that “to strike down part of a state constitution because of this history raises disturbing questions. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Montana Department of Revenue, which asks whether Montana’s invalidation of a law that created tax credits to provide scholarships for families who send their children to private schools, including religious schools, was constitutional, for this blog, in a post that first appeared at Howe on the Court. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:25 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v Munir and anor, heard 24 – 27 April 2012. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:47 am
Montana Department of Revenue in favor of parents wishing to use scholarships from a state-tax credit to send their children to religious schools, the outcome will have “significant religious liberty concerns that fall within the realm of land use and zoning, specifically, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. [read post]
23 May 2007, 10:51 am
(on the application of) [2007] EWCA Civ 498 (23 May 2007) Carnegie v Drury [2007] EWCA Civ 497 (23 May 2007) Secretary of State for the Home Department v Baiai & Ors [2007] EWCA Civ 478 (23 May 2007) Brunel University & Anor v Webster & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 482 (22 May 2007) ERG Raffinerie Mediterranee SPA v Chevron USA Inc (t/a Chevron Texaco Global Trading) [2007] EWCA Civ 494 (22 May 2007) C Plc v P & Anor… [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:00 pm
The case, Halbig et al v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 12:08 pm
The case, Halbig et al v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 10:03 am
The three-judge panel’s decision in Sissel v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 9:53 am
Borello & Sons, Inc v Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 9:53 am
Borello & Sons, Inc v Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341. [read post]
