Search for: "Hina Shamsi" Results 21 - 40 of 61
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2014, 3:17 am by Diane Marie Amann
Report Is Too Tainted to Matter ► Andrea Prasow (Human Rights Watch): The CIA’s rap sheet ► Hina Shamsi (American Civil Liberties Union): A Special Prosecutor, Compensation and C.I.A. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 6:50 pm by Benjamin Wittes
For the Motion: Alan Dershowitz, Professor of Law, Harvard Law School Michael Lewis, Professor of Law, Ohio Northern University School of Law Against the Motion: Noah Feldman, Professor of Law, Harvard Law School Hina Shamsi, Director of the ACLU National Security Project President Has Constitutional Power to Target Americans from Intelligence Squared U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 8:26 pm
  Arguing against the motion were Noah Feldman, professor of law, Harvard Law School; and Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU National Security Project. [read post]
On Wednesday, Hina Shamsi will take part in an Intelligence Squared debate on the question "Does the president have constitutional authority under the due process clause to kill U.S. citizens abroad, or is it a violation of this clause to unilaterally decide to target and kill Americans?" [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 3:49 am by Benjamin Wittes
Just Security‘s masthead includes, in addition to Steve and Ryan: Philip Alston, David Cole, Jen Daskal, Mary DeRosa, Daphne Eviatar, Shaheed Fatima, Jennifer Granick, Jameel Jaffer, Derek Jinks, Sarah Knuckey, Harold Hongju Koh, Marty Lederman, David Luban, Fionnuala Ní Aoláin, Julian Sanchez, Meg Satterthwaite, Steve Schulhofer, Hina Shamsi, Beth Van Schaack, Jeremy… [read post]
2 May 2013, 8:52 am by Ritika Singh
” John Bellinger spoke at the event—which was introduced by Thomas Kean, former governor of New Jersey—and featured Mark Mazzetti of the New York Times, Hina Shamsi of the ACLU, and Philip Zelikow of the University of Virginia. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 12:35 pm by Benjamin Wittes
” The panel was moderated by Mark Mazzetti of the New York Times and included: Daniel Bethlehem, 20 Essex Street, Legal Policy International, International Institute for Strategic Studies  David Glazier, Loyola Law School Marco Sassòli, University of Geneva Law School Hina Shamsi, National Security Project, American Civil Liberties Union I haven’t watched either yet. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 10:47 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
In Brussels yesterday, several members of the European Parliament (EP) hosted a first-ever briefing on the topic with the ACLU’s Hina Shamsi and Jamil Dakwar, and the U.N. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 12:37 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Next week, the ACLU’s Hina Shamsi and Jamil Dakwar, together with the UN Special Rapporteur on counter-terrorism and human rights, Ben Emmerson, will be speaking at a briefing organized by members of the European Parliament on the human rights costs and consequences of the targeted killing program. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 9:37 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Responding to The New York Times Valentine’s Day editorial on a possible targeted killing court, the ACLU’s Hina Shamsi and Christopher Anders go on record against the proposal. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 8:42 am by Jack Goldsmith
  Shane says that Hina Shamsi of the ACLU (these are Shane’s words) “said that a drone court would be a step backward, and that extradition and criminal prosecution of suspected terrorists was a better answer. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 2:28 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Hina Shamsi, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s National Security Project, welcomed the inquiry “in the hopes that global pressure will bring the U.S. back into line with international law requirements that strictly limit the use of lethal force. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 4:25 am by Benjamin Wittes
Conference participants like Marko Milanovic of the University of Nottingham and the ACLU’s Hina Shamsi contended that IHRL was the overarching legal regime governing targeted killing. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 3:56 pm by Matt Murphy
As Hina Shamsi, ACLU National Security Project director stated in a statement we issued at the time, “Our nation’s civilian and military courts have historically recognized that the truth, no matter how ugly, is better aired than concealed from the public. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:17 am by Benjamin Wittes
I haven’t yet read the complaint, which just became available a few moments ago, but Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU’s National Security Project, says the following in an email: Our lawsuit, which is against senior CIA and military officials, charges that the killings of U.S. citizens Anwar Al-Aulaqi, Samir Khan, and 16-year-old Abdulrahman Al-Aulaqi in Yemen last year violated the Constitution’s guarantee against the deprivation of life without due process of… [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 11:08 am by Rekha Arulanantham
This morning, USA Today ran an op-ed by ACLU National Security Project director, Hina Shamsi about the U.S. government’s unlawful targeted killing program. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:07 am by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
As Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU National Security Project notes: “The most important terrorism trial of our time should not be an exception to the rule of public access because its legitimacy depends in part on its transparency. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:59 am by Suzanne Ito
  UPDATE: This post has been updated to add a quote from Hina Shamsi. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 6:47 am by Suzanne Ito
'" You can watch the ACLU's Hina Shamsi here on MSNBC explaining why the military commissions fall short. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 4:55 pm by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
Also today, ACLU National Security Project Director Hina Shamsi went on Democracy Now to detail the many problems with the government’s explanation: Please note that by playing this clip You Tube and Google will place a long-term cookie on your computer. [read post]