Search for: "Hines v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2016, 10:58 am by Heidi A. Nadel
With two more justices - Justice Botsford and Justice Hines - scheduled to retire in 2017, the Court is undergoing a significant transition over a relatively short period. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 10:58 am by Heidi A. Nadel
With two more justices - Justice Botsford and Justice Hines - scheduled to retire in 2017, the Court is undergoing a significant transition over a relatively short period. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 10:58 am by Heidi A. Nadel
With two more justices - Justice Botsford and Justice Hines - scheduled to retire in 2017, the Court is undergoing a significant transition over a relatively short period. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am by The Complex Litigator
Superior Court, 36 Cal. 4th 148, 113 P. 3d 1100 (2005), the court found that the arbitration provision was unconscionable because AT&T had not shown that bilateral arbitration adequately substituted for the deterrent effects of class actions. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:39 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Remittitur The Supreme Court of Arizona rendered an opinion in Soto v, Sacco on July 13, 2017. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 1:53 pm by Hiro Aragaki
  A fortiori, it no longer captures the “purposes and objectives” (Hines v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1352-53 (Cal. 1996); Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass’n v. [read post]