Search for: "Hock v. Soles"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2018, 4:50 am
See Landau v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:10 am
Additionally, the claim should be reinstated against Moritt Hock for the period from September 2012 through 2016, when Levine was a partner at the firm and was [*2]allegedly still representing plaintiffs in connection with the audits and tax litigation. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 5:56 am
(Freeman v Brecher, 155AD3d 453,454 [1st Dept 2017], citing Kaminsky v Herrick, Feinstein LLP, 59 AD3d 1, 13 [1st Dept 2008]; see also Kaufman v Maritt Hock Hamroff, LLP, 192 AD3d 1092, 1093 [2d Dept 2021] [“Relief pursuant to Judiciary Law S 487 ‘is not given lightly’ and requires a showing of ‘egregious conduct or chronic and extreme pattern of behavior on the part of defendant attorneys’.]) [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 3:14 am
Additionally, the claim should be reinstated against Moritt Hock for the period from September 2012 through 2016, when Levine was a partner at the firm and was [*2]allegedly still representing plaintiffs in connection with the audits and tax litigation. [read post]
28 May 2014, 7:41 am
In Petrella v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 1:23 pm
The ruling in Anonymous v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:01 pm
Since Palmattere v. [read post]
