Search for: "Hoge v. Hoge"
Results 21 - 40
of 96
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2010, 11:13 am
This doctrine was confirmed in the cases of Natco Trust v. mr Thesseling q.q., Hoge Raad (Dutch Supreme Court) 20 April 1990, NJ 1991, 560; TAR-Justicia 1 (1991), p. 24-35, and IBC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 10:33 pm
In coming to this conclusion the Hoge Raad quoted extensively from the standards developed by the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in 2013 in Vinter and others v United Kingdom and in 2016 in Murray v The Netherlands but then set them out and developed them further in its own words. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 5:29 am
In a dispute that concerns all stripe-wearing kats, Case C-102/07 is a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden in the exciting contest of Adidas AG and Adidas Benelux BV v Marca Mode, C&A Nederland, H&M Hennes & Mauritz Netherlands BV and Vendex KBB Nederland BV. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Conflict of Laws.net had a post on a recent decision of the European Court of Justice, Prism Investments BV v. van der Meer. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 9:00 pm
Evidentemente também é válido para o sentido inverso. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 2:00 pm
Ohio v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 8:36 am
In deze zaak heeft de Procureur-Generaal bij de Hoge Raad beroep in cassatie in het belang der wet ingesteld. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 8:59 am
See the case of Ontvanger v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 10:08 am
Written by María Barral Martínez, a former trainee at the European Court of Justice (Chambers of AG Campos Sánchez-Bordona) and an alumna of the University of Amsterdam and the University of Santiago de Compostela The Hoge Raad Neederlanden (The Dutch Supreme Court), the referring court in the case Supreme Site Service and Others, C-186/19, harbours doubts regarding the international jurisdiction of Dutch courts under the Brussels I bis Regulation, in respect to a… [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 3:57 pm
Another mystery intellectual property case has caught the IPKat's attention: it's Case C-238/09, Handelsmaatschappij J. van Hilst and Others v The Jaguar Collection Limited and Others, a reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling. [read post]
3 May 2010, 5:56 am
In a case concerning the enforcement of a Belgian judgment in the Netherlands, between Prism Investments BV v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 2:30 am
Hoge v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 5:03 am
462/09 Stichting de Thuiskopie v Mijndert van der Lee, Hananja van der Lee and Opus Supplies Deutschland GmbH, this being a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (visit the 1709 Blog here for some interesting background material). [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 1:29 am
In this case, according to the Court, there is no ‘new public’, and therefore no copyright-relevant communication which requires separate permission from the rightholders.Prof VisserIn the early 1980s, the Dutch Supreme Court (Hoge Raad) ruled that in the case of cable retransmission within the reception area, there is a ‘communication to the public’. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:26 am
In Zuid-Chemie v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 9:00 pm
ABP, Hoge Raad (Dutch Supreme Court) 2 December 1994, NJ 1995, 288, and Constance et al. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:20 am
• Leave a comment on ECJ: Private copying levies II-the Stichting de Thuiskopie v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:22 am
Case citation: Hoge v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The beginning of the story that forms the basis for the preliminary ruling of the CJEU in Diageo Brands BV v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 1:10 am
These were the important questions that the Dutch Supreme Court (Hoge Raad der Nederlanden) had referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Stichting Brein v Ziggo, C-610/15 (also known as The Pirate Bay case).The AG OpinionIn his Opinion in February last [commented here, here, and to some extent here] Advocate General (AG) Szpunar answered both questions in the affirmative. [read post]
