Search for: "Hoge v. Hoge"
Results 41 - 60
of 96
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2017, 3:19 am
These were the important questions that the Dutch Supreme Court (Hoge Raad der Nederlanden) had referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Stichting Brein v Ziggo, C-610/15 (also known as The Pirate Bay case).The AG OpinionIn his Opinion in February last [commented here, here, and to some extent here] Advocate General (AG) Szpunar answered both questions in the affirmative. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:40 am
In its decision on the case Johannes Gerrit Cornelis van Schaik v Hoge Raad der Nederlanden in Para 21 the Court has ruled that: ...Article 4 of the directive further provides that the roadworthiness tests, within the meaning of the directive, are to be carried out by the State or by bodies or establishments designated and directly supervised by the State. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:03 am
KG v Stokke A/S, Stokke Nederland BV, Peter Opsvik and Peter Opsvik A/S was decided on 18 September, but this Kat -- who has been beset by a succession of happy distractions -- has only just got round to writing it up for the weblog. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 7:01 am
Case C‑30/14, Ryanair Ltd v PR Aviation BV is a real quickie. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:12 pm
Apple and Apple v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 7:54 am
Daarover mocht de Hoge Raad oordelen in zijn arrest van 9 mei 2014 (ECLI:NL:HR:2014:1089). [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 4:01 am
Today's the day the Court of Justice of the European Union gave judgment in Case C-462/09 Stichting de Thuiskopie v Opus Supplies Deutschland GmbH, Mijndert van der Lee and Hananja van der Lee, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (the Dutch Supreme Court). [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 6:31 am
See the case of Ontvanger v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 12:30 am
C-133/08), was lodged on 29 July 2010 under C-384/10, Jan Voogsgeerd v Navimer SA. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:34 am
By K&L Gates Qualcomm Inc. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 4:37 pm
" is the title of neat piece of analysis of the recent Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia decision in University of Western Australia v Gray [2009] FCAFC 116 (3 September 2009). [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:53 pm
No. 17 v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:45 am
Against that background, the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Supreme Court of the Netherlands) decided to seek a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 7:01 am
Midsummer Madness — 2014 The Tragic Case of Casey Kasem Plus: New York’s “164%” Estate Tax, Slayers Inherit from Victims, and John Wayne’s Heirs Sue Duke University By Robert L. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 11:02 am
Does 1-10 (same); Hoge v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 9:28 am
Dutch Supreme Court Refers Questions on Article 5(3) Brussels I Regulation Hoge Raad, 4 April 2008, Zuid-Chemie/Philippo’s Mineralenfabriek Nr. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 4:05 am
Instead, the court followed the lead of the Sixth Circuit in Hoge v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:03 pm
The case in question is Case C-119/10 Frisdranken Industrie Winters BV v Red Bull GmbH. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:22 pm
558/08 Portakabin Ltd and Portakabin BV v Primakabin BV, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands).Portakabin Ltd, who made and sold mobile buildings, owned the Benelux trade mark PORTAKABIN for goods in Classes 6 (metal buildings, parts and building materials) and 19 (non-metal buildings, parts and building materials). [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:49 am
Hoge, 468 A.2d 1380 (Pa. 1983). [read post]
