Search for: "Hoge v. Hoge"
Results 61 - 80
of 96
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2011, 4:20 am
Dunham v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:20 am
• Leave a comment on ECJ: Private copying levies II-the Stichting de Thuiskopie v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 4:01 am
Today's the day the Court of Justice of the European Union gave judgment in Case C-462/09 Stichting de Thuiskopie v Opus Supplies Deutschland GmbH, Mijndert van der Lee and Hananja van der Lee, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (the Dutch Supreme Court). [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:53 pm
No. 17 v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 7:40 am
Louis Vuitton v Nadia Plesner). [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 5:03 am
462/09 Stichting de Thuiskopie v Mijndert van der Lee, Hananja van der Lee and Opus Supplies Deutschland GmbH, this being a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (visit the 1709 Blog here for some interesting background material). [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:38 am
Recently, the November/December issue of the German law journal “Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts” (IPRax) was published. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 12:30 am
C-133/08), was lodged on 29 July 2010 under C-384/10, Jan Voogsgeerd v Navimer SA. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:26 am
In Zuid-Chemie v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 11:13 am
This doctrine was confirmed in the cases of Natco Trust v. mr Thesseling q.q., Hoge Raad (Dutch Supreme Court) 20 April 1990, NJ 1991, 560; TAR-Justicia 1 (1991), p. 24-35, and IBC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 8:59 am
See the case of Ontvanger v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 9:28 am
Dutch Supreme Court Refers Questions on Article 5(3) Brussels I Regulation Hoge Raad, 4 April 2008, Zuid-Chemie/Philippo’s Mineralenfabriek Nr. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:28 am
Jan von Hein: “Die Produkthaftung des Zulieferers im Europäischen Internationalen Zivilprozessrecht” – the English abstract reads as follows: The most recent decision of the ECJ on Article 5 No 3 of the Brussels I-Regulation, Zuid-Chemie v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:22 pm
558/08 Portakabin Ltd and Portakabin BV v Primakabin BV, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands).Portakabin Ltd, who made and sold mobile buildings, owned the Benelux trade mark PORTAKABIN for goods in Classes 6 (metal buildings, parts and building materials) and 19 (non-metal buildings, parts and building materials). [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:03 pm
The case in question is Case C-119/10 Frisdranken Industrie Winters BV v Red Bull GmbH. [read post]
3 May 2010, 5:56 am
In a case concerning the enforcement of a Belgian judgment in the Netherlands, between Prism Investments BV v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 9:21 pm
The Court of Justice in its recent judgment of 6 October 2009, ICF v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 9:19 pm
Reference on Art. 1 Brussels I Regulation (C-406/09; Realchemie Nederland BV v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 3:57 pm
Another mystery intellectual property case has caught the IPKat's attention: it's Case C-238/09, Handelsmaatschappij J. van Hilst and Others v The Jaguar Collection Limited and Others, a reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 9:51 pm
From the IPKat's much valued friend and scholar Dirk Visser (Klos Morel Vos & Schaap; Professor of Intellectual Property Law at Leiden University) comes news of last week's decision of the Hoge Raad -- the Dutch Supreme Court -- in Case LJN BJ6999, Lego Nederland B.V. c.s v Mega Brands Inc c.s. [read post]
