Search for: "Hoge v. Hoge" Results 81 - 96 of 96
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2009, 4:37 pm
" is the title of neat piece of analysis of the recent Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia decision in University of Western Australia v Gray [2009] FCAFC 116 (3 September 2009). [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 12:27 pm
It nearly sneaked past everyone without being spotted, but the European Court of Justice ruling in Case C-324/08 Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands), was handed down earlier today. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 9:32 pm
Yesterday, the ECJ delivered its judgments in cases C-189/08 (Zuid-Chemie BV v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
They still do, despite that decision, see the ruling of the Hoge Raad (Dutch Supreme Court) on 30th November 2007 in Roche v Primus following the ruling of the ECJ. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 4:30 pm
The case, lodged on 2 April 2008, is pending under C-133/08, ICF (Intercontainer Interfrigo (ICF) SC v [...] [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 2:52 am
  Problems may ensue:"In a recent legal malpractice case, Mattingly v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:04 am
Examples have been found of the Hoge Raad indicating the role of the fundamental right to teach in the adjudication of the legality of a contract stipulating the waiver of the right to teach mensendieck exercises in the case of a failed examination (NJ 1970, 57, Mensendieck I; and NJ 1971, 407, Mensendieck II). [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:49 pm
April 2004 CanadaAbstractAlthough some studies suggest positive effects of treatment for sexual offenders, most studies have been hampered by the unknown influence of selective attrition (e.g., volunteers and drop-outs). [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 5:29 am
In a dispute that concerns all stripe-wearing kats, Case C-102/07 is a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden in the exciting contest of Adidas AG and Adidas Benelux BV v Marca Mode, C&A Nederland, H&M Hennes & Mauritz Netherlands BV and Vendex KBB Nederland BV. [read post]