Search for: "Holcombe v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 142
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2011, 5:00 am by admin
Sources: Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles – Seat Belt Use Climbs in Virginia Compared to Last Year 2011 Use Rate is Second Highest Ever Loudoun Times – Virginia seat belt usage climbs to second-highest rate on record Fairfax Times – Virginia seat belt usage climbs to second-highest rate on record – Highest recorded rate came in 2009 with 82.3 percent of state buckling up *v [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 1:30 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
  For more information about NY Business for Marriage, please contact Desma Holcomb at ESPA by phone at (212) 627-0305 or by e-mail  dholcomb@prideagenda.org . [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 10:48 am by Steve Hall
The Court of Criminal Appeals opinion in Lykos v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 11:12 am by Brandy M. Wingate
Judge Price filed a dissenting opinion, joined by Judges Meyers, Johnson, and Holcomb. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 11:12 am by Brandy M. Wingate
Judge Price filed a dissenting opinion, joined by Judges Meyers, Johnson, and Holcomb. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 12:06 am
Union animusCSEA Local 860 v PERB, 276 AD2d 967, Motion for leave to appeal denied, 96 NY2d 704Michael Holcomb, a probationary employee, was terminated from his employment as a maintenance laborer with the Westchester County Department of Environmental Facilities [DEF]. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:50 am by B.W. Barnett
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’ recent decision in Uranga v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 3:58 am
The Appellate Division’s consolidated decision in Holcomb and Hetherington cases illustrate such an exception.Michael Holcomb and Helen E. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 10:26 am by B.W. Barnett
State, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held that, under the cognate pleadings approach to one-step lesser-included-offenses (see Hall v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 7:46 am by B.W. Barnett
In an unflinching dissent, Judge Price (joined with Judges Meyers, Johnson, and Holcomb) stated: By dint of persistence, a plurality of the Court purports to overrule Clewis. [read post]