Search for: "Holder v. Martin"
Results 1 - 20
of 253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2016, 12:43 pm
Case citation: Martin v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
S’holders Litig., No. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 3:57 am
Martin v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 7:03 pm
See, Zoltek Corp. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 5:16 am
Martin v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 9:30 am
Martin v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:45 am
However: (1) the social benefit in having a truthful depiction of King's actual words would be much greater than the copyright owners' loss, and (2) it is not required that all four fair use factors weigh in favour of a finding of fair use, as recent judgments, eg Cariou v Prince [here] or Seltzer v Green Day [here], demonstrate. [read post]
20 May 2013, 7:38 am
The following day, Martin conveyed the land to Fred and Ruth Fisher. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 9:27 pm
” Notably, in Authors Guild v. [read post]
6 Nov 2024, 11:10 am
On October 31, 2024, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a letter opinion in Martin Floreani v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:57 am
James Martin et al. (2016). [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 4:31 am
On Trayvon Martin Shooter of unarmed Florida teen gets second lawyer {Reuters} Trayvon Martin case: Inquiry into Stand Your Ground law launched in Florida {Christian Science Monitor} Poll regarding Trayvon Martin’s killing shows racial divide {USA Today} POTUS & SCOTUS AG Eric Holder to 5th Circuit: We’re aware of Marbury v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
Holder was decided. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 12:40 pm
Monday was Martin Luther King day, so counsel drove to the post office herself first thing in the morning Tuesday, and sent the papers express mail for guaranteed delivery Wednesday, which is when they were due. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:38 am
In Holder v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm
Martin (09-996). [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:17 pm
(UK) Ltd. v J.P. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 6:24 am
Holder, No. 09-89, Ralph D. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:21 am
EduCap, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 4:02 am
This morning the CJEU (second chamber) handed down judgement in case C-98/13, Martin Blomqvist v Rolex SA,Manufacture des Montres Rolex SAThe point at issue before the CJEU (set out in a series of questions which the court condensed to a single answer) was that, in the scenario where somebody purchased from a non-EU website counterfeit goods (in this case, a fake Rolex), could these be seized by customs, it being apparently common ground that the Customs Regulation… [read post]
