Search for: "Holder v. Smith"
Results 21 - 40
of 573
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm
Tendering of a cheque can amount to (conditional) payment, if the cheque is honoured (Felix Hadley & Co v Hadley (1898) 2 Ch 681 ), and if so, counts as payment at the date the cheque is tendered (Homes v Smith (2000) Lloyds LR 139 ). [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts 1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts 1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 7:29 am
This post is the second of four, considering the decision of Smith J in Lidl v Tesco [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch), focusing on the passing off element of the judgment. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 6:15 am
Of course, such decisions can and this one is indeed going to be appealed--which is also a safe assumption with respect to an even higher-profile recent FRAND ruling by the same court, Mr Justice Marcus Smith's Optis v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:06 am
One key overlap between Mr Justice Smith's approach in Optis v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
Optis v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 7:14 am
Smith, a father of two children. [read post]
23 May 2023, 4:57 am
This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
4 May 2023, 5:16 am
The Supreme Court recognized risks of this kind in a 1959 obscenity prosecution against a bookseller, Smith v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:05 pm
In the landmark case of Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 8:04 pm
" But NRA v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
” Ashcroft v. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
V. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am
Their images should be treated with the same scorn as those depicting Chief Justice Roger Taney, the author of the execrable decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:42 am
Tarter Smith (an insured) spearheaded the litigation from its inception. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 8:06 am
This was also an issue for the Singapore High Court in The “STI Orchard” [2022], SGHCR 6 on which Reed Smith has reported here. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:29 pm
Lorie Smith listens to oral argument in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 6:15 am
The understanding of aggression, the collective act underlying the crime, has remained virtually unchanged in GA Resolution 3314 and Article 8bis(2) of the ICC Statute since it was first introduced by a Soviet diplomat in 1933 and was found to reflect customary law by the International Court of Justice (Nicaragua v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
” Now leading precedent in Canadian Aboriginal law, the decision produced in Delgamuukw v British Columbia has been cited countless times in both the courts and the legal academy. [read post]
