Search for: "Hollander v. Smith & Smith" Results 41 - 60 of 136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2010, 7:52 am by Richard Gershon
When he left the Attorney General's office, he  practiced law with the firm of Holland, Bevis & Smith, now Holland & Knight. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 8:26 am
" The primary development is likely the Supreme Court's 2007 decision three months later in Smith v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 9:56 am by Steve Worrall
Holland, Holland, Schaeffer Roddenbery Blitch, LLP, Atlanta, and Kice H. [read post]
25 May 2010, 9:56 am by Steve Worrall
Holland, Holland, Schaeffer Roddenbery Blitch, LLP, Atlanta, and Kice H. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
Smith v Kunkel16 is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
Smith v Kunkel16 is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Regner and Jacob Dougherty (Debevoise & Plimpton LLP), on Saturday, February 10, 2024 Tags: Controller, delaware, Delaware Supreme Court, Kahn v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Regner and Jacob Dougherty (Debevoise & Plimpton LLP), on Saturday, February 10, 2024 Tags: Controller, delaware, Delaware Supreme Court, Kahn v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 11:45 am by Georgialee Lang
That was then, and much has changed, according to Madam Justice Lynn Smith of British Columbia’s Supreme Court who handed down a 395-page decision yesterday, (Carter v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 1:05 am
" As Darian observes, Chancellor Chandler noted in his Disney opinion the tension between this view and the collective liability view espoused by Smith v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 2:37 pm by GiovannaShay
Smith on the value of mitigation evidence in capital cases, or even consider the opinion in Holland v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiff failed to allege sufficient facts to establish that Dougherty intended to deceive through his actions in the prior hybrid action/proceeding (see Klein v Rieff, 135 AD3d 910, 912 [2016]; Seldon v Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, 116 AD3d 490, 491 [2014]; see also Doscher v Meyer, 177 AD3d 697, 699 [2019]). [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 11:33 am by Wells Bennett
 Well, then, how is the defense to proceed if, say, FBI Agent Smith simply shows up and reads aloud from a report, about what a Yemeni did or did not say? [read post]