Search for: "Holm v. Holm" Results 41 - 60 of 2,131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 6:27 am by Ellena Erskine
The justices will then hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:32 am by Scott Bomboy
The committee quoted Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 10:42 am by Gritsforbreakfast
It's incredibly frustrating, particularly for someone who started this work in the halcyon pre-Holmes-v-Morales era.4) Since I'd written on Grits about the Texas prison system's long-defunct prison-baseball league, I should mention finding this article recently referencing the "Satchel Paige" of the Texas prison system, Claud "Scottie" Walker, a negro-league alum who played for Rube Foster's Chicago American Giants and was still hurling… [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Justice Holmes, while on the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, equated physical appropriation and regulations which stripped an owner of his rights. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Supreme Court case, Relentless Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Lee Wilson leads the new “legal history emphasis area” in the Department of History and Geography’s at Clemson University (Clemson News).Here is the historians' amicus brief in the free speech case, Moody v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 10:52 am by Ben Sperry
United States, 250 U.S. 616, 630 (1919) (Holmes, J., dissenting)). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:16 am by Ben Sperry
Supreme Court has alluded to the market for ideas in First Amendment law for more than a century, dating back at least to Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes dissent in Abrams v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
The article complained of had said that Neumann “defrauded” investors in We Work and likened him to convicted fraudster Elizabeth Holmes. [read post]