Search for: "Holmes v Gary Goldberg & Co., Inc."
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2019, 4:19 am
Here, contrary to the moving defendants’ contention, the Barons established, prima facie, that Anthony was acting within the scope of his employment by demonstrating that Anthony’s theft of the Barons’ funds was foreseeable (see Holmes v Gary Goldberg & Co., Inc., 40 AD3d at 1035; Hatton v Quad Realty Corp., 100 AD2d 609, 610). [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
