Search for: "Holstein v. Holstein"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2010, 10:43 am
Oral Argument in case# 09-2822; USA v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:38 am
KREMER, HEAVENLEE HOLSTEINS,... [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 11:33 pm
Last week, the verdict was affirmed on appeal in Holstein v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 4:28 pm
The volume on The Common Law Jurisprudence of the Conflict of Laws, edited by Sarah McKibbin (University of Southern Queensland) and Anthony Kennedy (Serle Court), recently published by Hart, does just that, by discussing cases like Vita Food Products, Brook v Brook, Bonython v Commonwealth of Australia, AG v Heinemann Publishers (better known as the Australian Spycatcher case), Bremen v Zapata, Vizcaya v Picard, and Kuwait Airways (Nos 4 and 5). [read post]
13 May 2014, 3:18 am
Those were the facts in Smith v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 5:57 am
The case is Facebook Inc. and Facebook Ireland Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 2:27 pm
I recall the TI v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
In Cooperstown Holstein Corporation v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:16 am
Any other construction of the order would be contrary to law, since an attorney discharged for cause "has no right to compensation or to a retaining lien" (Teichner v W & J Holsteins, 64 NY2d 977, 979 [1985]). [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:07 am
Any other construction of the order would be contrary to law, since an attorney discharged for cause "has no right to compensation or to a retaining lien" (Teichner v W & J Holsteins, 64 NY2d 977, 979 [1985]). [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 4:27 am
W & J Holsteins, Inc., 64 NY2d 977 (1985). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 2:59 am
W & J Holsteins, Inc., 64 NY2d 977 (1985). [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:22 am
W & J Holsteins, Inc., 64 NY2d 977 (1985). [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 3:41 am
So Holstein shot him. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 4:47 pm
Reliance was placed on the CJEU decision in the case of Unabhängiges Landeszentrum für Datenschutz Schleswig-Holstein v Wirtschaftsakademie Schleswig-Holstein GmbH (C ‑ 210/16, EU: C: 2018: 388 ) [98]. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:07 am
In general, a hearing is required to determine whether a client has cause for discharging an attorney (see Teichner v W & J Holsteins, 64 NY2d 977, 979; Ulico Cas. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 2:43 pm
The court’s decision in Cooperstown Holstein Corporation v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 9:44 am
The appellate opinion is Zweig v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:56 am
Have they finally solved the Schleswig-Holstein question? [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 12:23 pm
Town of Dryden (Tompkins County) and Cooperstown Holstein Corp. v. [read post]
