Search for: "Holt v. May" Results 61 - 80 of 352
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2010, 3:51 am by Dave
The judgment of the PC was delivered by Sir Jonathan Parker and it will be of particular interest as it demonstrates the continuing importance of the Court of Appeal's excellent judgment in Gillett v Holt [2000] EWCA Civ 66 as well as raising (without deciding) the interesting issue of the remedy when section 116, LRA 2002 is in issue in relation to third party buyers after the estoppel has been established. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:51 am by Dave
The judgment of the PC was delivered by Sir Jonathan Parker and it will be of particular interest as it demonstrates the continuing importance of the Court of Appeal's excellent judgment in Gillett v Holt [2000] EWCA Civ 66 as well as raising (without deciding) the interesting issue of the remedy when section 116, LRA 2002 is in issue in relation to third party buyers after the estoppel has been established. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   Anyone wishing to review Judge Brann's notable decision in the Holt case may click HEREI send thanks to Attorney James M. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 1:00 am by Giles Peaker
This is a guest post by Jonathan Holt of Garden Court North Chambers. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) April 22, 2014 Tweet Tags: racial preferences, Sonia Sotomayor, Supreme CourtSchuette v. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 11:53 am by Eugene Volokh
For a related but different question of whether an employer may fire an employee based on the employee’s gun possession on property owned or controlled by the employer, compare Plona v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:36 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Similar to its federal counterpart, Colorado Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the... [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:03 am by Jamie Markham
The Supreme Court held this week in Holt v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:12 am
School Dist., 52 NY2d 625.In Holt the Court of Appeals said that letters in an employee's personnel file commenting on that employee's conduct or performance that the employer found unsatisfactory did not constitute discipline. [read post]