Search for: "Holt v. May"
Results 121 - 140
of 352
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2009, 9:21 am
HodgkinsonWhether Gant error requires suppressionStanton Holt v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 10:44 am
Holt. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 4:25 am
However, a party may forfeit that right if he or she abuses the judicial process by engaging in [*2]meritless litigation motivated by spite or ill will (see Duffy v Holt-Harris, 260 AD2d 595; Matter of Shreve v Shreve, 229 AD2d 1005). [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 8:51 am
In Summers v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:02 am
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 7:44 am
’ Thomas v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
At the National Review Online’s Bench Memos blog, Carrie Severino notes the “strange bedfellows” that have filed amicus briefs in next Term’s Holt v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 3:28 am
These summaries are based on the issues listed in the briefs filed and may not very accurately or fully describe the actual issues in the cases. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:34 am
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 3:17 am
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:43 am
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 3:19 am
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:57 am
"As the Commissioner of Education indicated in Fusco v Jefferson County School District, CEd, 14,396, decided June 27, 2000, and Irving v Troy City School District, CEd 14,373, decided May 25, 2000, 'Comments critical of employee performance do not, without more, constitute disciplinary action. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:18 am
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 7:06 am
Holt, 2007 U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 12:12 pm
Holt, 52 N.Y.2d 625, 439 N.Y.S.2d 839; O'Connor v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:17 am
Accordingly, “when a litigant is abusing the judicial process by harassing individuals solely out of ill will or spite, equity may enjoin such [*2]vexatious litigation” (Breytman v Pinnacle Group, 110 AD3d 754, 755; see Breytman v Schechter, 101 AD3d 783, 785; Vogelgesang v Vogelgesang, 71 AD3d at 1134; Matter of Simpson v Ptaszynska, 41 AD3d 607, 608; Duffy v Holt-Harris, 260 AD2d 595; Matter of… [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
--> TDCA is broader in scope than FDCPA.In Texas FDCPA and TDCA claims are often brought in the same action, which may be filed in state or federal court. [read post]
Putting traffic detainee in back of police car was investigative technique but without justification
2 Sep 2007, 11:02 am
Holt, 264 F.3d 1215, 1221 (10th Cir. 2001). . . . [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:07 am
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
